Stranica 3 od 3

Re: Re:

Poslato: 02 Mar 2017, 13:15
od Sixto
[url=http://www.gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2784941#p2784941]haemoglobin napisao:[/url]
[url=https://gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2784834#p2784834]ZlatnaPtica napisao:[/url]Tri godine su u vezi i partner ju je (potencijalno) pokušao prevariti, reakcija ove vrste je vrlo opravdana i kontam da nije materijal za terapiju ukoliko ne ostavi neke trajnije posledice. To što je momak potencijalno bisex i što je ta druga osoba transvestit je potpuno nebitna stvar, može ona njega da prihvati takvog kakav jeste ali to ne opravdava prevaru.
[url=https://gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2784857#p2784857]ZlatnaPtica napisao:[/url]Ako su u monogamnoj vezi, onda se njegovo seksualno ponašanje nje itekako tiče, jer su se obavezali na isključiv odnos. Stoga, ako on planira nekakve izlete sa strane, jedino je fer da o tome sa njom porazgovara, pa da joj ostavi izbor da li želi da bude u vezi ili ne.
baviti se njihovom monogamijom je jednako gledanju "Parova"

Jao milice sine sva si mi razvratnica buntovna postala! UOPAAAA! :bic:

Re: Potrebna mi je pomoc

Poslato: 02 Mar 2017, 13:22
od haemoglobin
[url=https://gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2784888#p2784888]Insorcer napisao:[/url]


Ali mene ne slušaj, ja sam dokona pederčina koja neće odustati od mlevenja dok ne vidi malo suvislijeg tvog stava prema životu. Nadanja, strahovi, čekanja... Za to ja vremena nemam, i ne savetujem ni tebi da imaš.
https://youtu.be/h3HiPdkugLU?t=29s

Poslato: 02 Mar 2017, 13:24
od Insorcer
:mama:


:sarana:

Poslato: 02 Mar 2017, 13:31
od ZlatnaPtica
TIL da je razumevanje koncepta monogamije jednako gledanju nekog treš rijalitija. Okej.

Re: Potrebna mi je pomoc

Poslato: 02 Mar 2017, 13:36
od haemoglobin
ne, vec sagledavanje necije monogamije i problema u vezi kao teme za razgovor je jednako Parovima.

stvarno bi bila palanacka posla raspredati jel ok sto neko nekog vara

Re: Potrebna mi je pomoc

Poslato: 02 Mar 2017, 13:38
od Speculum Columbae
[url=http://www.gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2784946#p2784946]haemoglobin napisao:[/url]ne, vec sagledavanje necije monogamije i problema u vezi kao teme za razgovor je jednako Parovima.

stvarno bi bila palanacka posla raspredati jel ok sto neko nekog vara
slažem se ali žena nam se sama obratila za pomoć i razgovor, i svi su joj napisali šta misle, nije da ljudi idu iza leđa i ocenjuju njenu vezu i privatnost, posebno ne na senzacionalistički i dušebrižnički način.

Re: Potrebna mi je pomoc

Poslato: 02 Mar 2017, 13:43
od haemoglobin
[url=https://gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2784947#p2784947]Speculum Columbae napisao:[/url]
[url=http://www.gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2784946#p2784946]haemoglobin napisao:[/url]ne, vec sagledavanje necije monogamije i problema u vezi kao teme za razgovor je jednako Parovima.

stvarno bi bila palanacka posla raspredati jel ok sto neko nekog vara
slažem se ali žena nam se sama obratila za pomoć i razgovor, i svi su joj napisali šta misle, nije da ljudi idu iza leđa i ocenjuju njenu vezu i privatnost, posebno ne na senzacionalistički i dušebrižnički način.
ostalo je nejasno kakvu pomoc ocekuje i koje je konkretno tu pitanje za nas, a koje za NJEGA

Re: Potrebna mi je pomoc

Poslato: 02 Mar 2017, 13:43
od Speculum Columbae
Nekada je pomoć samo razgovor jbg

Re: Potrebna mi je pomoc

Poslato: 02 Mar 2017, 14:07
od ZlatnaPtica
[url=http://gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2784947#p2784947]Speculum Columbae napisao:[/url]
[url=http://www.gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2784946#p2784946]haemoglobin napisao:[/url]ne, vec sagledavanje necije monogamije i problema u vezi kao teme za razgovor je jednako Parovima.

stvarno bi bila palanacka posla raspredati jel ok sto neko nekog vara
slažem se ali žena nam se sama obratila za pomoć i razgovor, i svi su joj napisali šta misle, nije da ljudi idu iza leđa i ocenjuju njenu vezu i privatnost, posebno ne na senzacionalistički i dušebrižnički način.
Upravo ovo :up:

Re: Potrebna mi je pomoc

Poslato: 02 Mar 2017, 14:34
od Insorcer
[url=http://gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2784866#p2784866]mikrotalasna napisao:[/url] Pritom deluje mi nemoguce da je momak koji toliko voli zenski polni organ gej... lik uziva u lizanju vise nego ja, ponekad imam utisak.
Kapiram da je u ovome ključ trogodišnjosti monogamije, on zasigurno stekne utisak da trandža više uživa u pušenju njegova kurca nego li on sam.

I ko kaže da se sličnosti odbijaju??!


:sarana:

Re: Potrebna mi je pomoc

Poslato: 25 Dec 2017, 14:42
od heksagon123
Poslušati stručnjaka Rod Fleming se zove i takodjer obrađuje temu na YT-u - "Who are the men who love transwomen"..mislim da će biti od koristi iako pošto je tema od ožujka vjerujem da se ova djevojka već kurtanisala ovog momka ili što već, nebitno.... Uglavnom, takvi likovi koliko god bili čudni, nisu ni najmanje gay a detalje pogledati u videu kao i moguće uzroke takvog ponašanja, čak je i sam Fleming kod sebe primijetio slično nesto.,takodjer je i vrlo obazriv u izražavanju, ja baš i nisam od lijepih riječi, tako da watch the video,ovdje ti niko nema pojma o nicemu takvome.

Poslato: 25 Dec 2017, 15:19
od Anhedonie
gej/bi/strejt kao termini su stereotipi da bi se olaksao svakodnevni govor o seksualnosti. to nije kategorija, nije stanje osobe, nije kutija u koju moras da udjes... kada se u pitanje dovede sta znaci biti muskarac/zena i uvede se rodna fluidnost onda vise nema smisla koristiti takve termine jer ne olaksava nista, a jos ako projektujes sebe kroz termine i pokusavas da se uklopis u kutije - kuku za tebe.

Re: Potrebna mi je pomoc

Poslato: 25 Dec 2017, 17:23
od heksagon123
Slažem se donekle.
Samo što za mene , a vjerujem i za sve stručnije ljude postoje ozbiljno samo dva roda- muški i ženski. Fluidnost je samo naziv onda za ljude koji nose malo drugačiju odjeću ili nisu stereotipni što je nonsens, oni su i dalje muškarci i žene, jer ako pogledamo svakog čovjeka kao individualca, zapravo je onda 70 posto populacije " fluidno" jer ni žene psihički ni vizualno nisu ono od prije 150 godina, a nisu ni muskarcu- mada je i tada bilo rodne fluidnost garant, barem u psihičkom smislu, samo se slabije uočavala za razliku od danas kada smo previše osjetljivi na sve i sve zamjećujemo i želimo stavit u neku košaru, previse pozornosti dajemo emocijama umjesto zdravom razumu što nikako nije dobro, trebamo biti kritični i samokriticni te sve gledati na temelju činjenica i svima bi život bio lakši.. Što će nam taj label uopće da označi većinu ljudi zapravo.
U potpunosti bespotrebno.

Poslato: 25 Dec 2017, 18:05
od Anhedonie
lose verujes

pricaj bilo sa kojim antropologom o tome

Re: Potrebna mi je pomoc

Poslato: 26 Dec 2017, 22:46
od Vel boy
između ostalog čitav život sam se bavio na razne načine psihama samoizjašnjenih heteroseksualnih muškaraca, i evo, na engleskom, šta su moji zaključci s kojim se slažu i svi relevantni savremeni progresivni psiholozi, antropolozi itd....

Human sexualities i.e. sexual orientations and their types and subtypes (incl. certain aspects on sexual roles and/or gender identities) especially of socially and self acclaimed heterosexual human male sexual orientation - which turns out that is not limited only and exclusively always on the opposite cis-gender (biological females), in human biological males with the average prevalencies in every society, nation, race, ethnicity, country, continent.... on this planet

1. heterosexual "straight" men exclusively and always with exclusively and always cis-gendered biological females --- although heterosexistically socially constructed to be assumed and declared as a huge majority of human males, it is actually a relative minority of human males but conditioned by societal multimillenial institutionality of heterosexism and homohatred, they are assumed, wrongly, and declared, wrongly, to be supermajority

2. heterosexual "straight" men unlimited i.e. not limited only and exclusively always on the opposite cis-gender (biological females) ----- may be of following subtypes
a) mostly heterosexual "straight" as in sense under 1. (majority of 2), but with certain, occasional, rather rare pro-sexual (verbal or behavioral actions in which they assert and show-off their (alpha-hyper-masculine-dominant) masculinity, and/or (mutual) masturbations*) or sexual activities (but exclusively and always as sexually "active" or "dominant" or "top") with other biological men that they find somehow someways remind them of females and/or certain types of biological and/or modifed men (often and potentially incl. varieties of transvestite or transgendered individuals). men of this category subtype who occasionally, rather rarely or more frequently, fantasize (whether admittedly or no) about the above described activities but have not or would not act them, are "curious" or "potential" sub-subtype of this category.
b) as in sense under 2 a), but with more frequent or regular (than in category 2 a)) pro-sexual (verbal or behavioral actions in which they assert and show-off their (alpha-hyper-masculine-dominant) masculinity, and/or (mutual) masturbations*) or sexual activities (but exclusively and always as sexually "active" or "dominant" or "top") with other biological men that they find somehow someways remind them of females and/or certain types of biological and/or modifed men (often or potentially incl. varieties of transvestite or transgendered individuals). the reason of this subtype to still belong to category 2. i.e. heterosexual "straight" men unlimited i.e. not limited only and exclusively always on the opposite gender (biological females) is in their exclusive and always sexually "active" or "dominant" or "top" role with other biological men that they find somehow someways remind them of females and/or certain types of biological and/or modifed men (often or potentially incl. varieties of transvestite or transgendered individuals).it could be argued that this subtype could belong to category 3. i.e. bisexual men subtype 3 a) i.e. exclusively and always sexually "active" or "dominant" or "top" with other biological men that they find somehow someways remind them of females and/or certain types of biological and/or modifed men (often or potentially incl. varieties of transgendered individuals), but because the men of this subtype i.e. 2 b) are overall still more frequently and regularly in sexual relations with the opposite gender (biological females) than bisexual men subtype 3 a) (who are evenly or about evenly frequent or regular in sexual relations with both (opposite and same, biological or modified genders)), they i.e. the men of this subtype i.e. 2 b) are in this category.
c) as in sense under 2 a) in regards of only certain, occasional, rather rare pro-sexual or sexual activities with other biological men that they find somehow someways remind them of females and/or certain types of biological and/or modifed men (often or potentially incl. varieties of transvestite or transgendered individuals). the difference from 2 a) is in not exclusively or not necessarily always asserting their alpha-hyper-masculine dominancy and/or sexually "active" or "dominant" or "top" role in those sexual or pro-sexual activities. in other words, men of this subtype can display varieties of roles (whether "versatile" or alpha-hyper-masculine sexually "active" or "dominant" or "top", or sexually "passive" or "submissive" or "bottom" ) in sexual or pro-sexual activities with other biological men that they find somehow someways remind them of females and/or certain types of biological and/or modifed men (often or potentially incl. varieties of transvestite or transgendered individuals) similar to "versatile" bisexual men i.e. category 3 subtype 3 b), only different from "versatile" bisexual men is that this subtype of men i.e. 2 c) are overall more frequently or regularly in sexual relations with the opposite gender (biological females) than bisexual men of any subtype (who are evenly or about evenly frequent or regular in sexual relations with both (opposite and same, biological or modified genders)). men of this category subtype who occasionally, rather rarely or more frequently, fantasize (whether admittedly or no) about the above described activities but have not or would not act them, are "curious" or "potential" sub-subtype of this category.


this whole category 2. i.e. heterosexual "straight" men unlimited i.e. not limited only and exclusively always on the opposite cis-gender (biological females) is not only a relative majority of all human males but also, in the context of heterosexistical "straight" social construct of supposed huge majority of category 1. i.e. exclusively and always heterosexual "straight" men, one of the very biggest unadmitted, unrecognized, denied and societal "taboo" and/or "closeted" phenomenas. (it is also very important to study whether the men of this category are, in negative context, the main perpetrators of antigay bullyings, bashings, attacks, crimes... especially related to their overall denial (which is unjustly imposed a conditioned consequence of heterosexistical homophobic "straight" social construct of supposed "normalcy" to be category 1. i.e. exclusively and always heterosexual "straight" men) of the characteristics of and belonging to this category 2). also, this whole category 2 i.e. heterosexual "straight" men unlimited i.e. not limited only and exclusively always on the opposite gender (biological females) is a typical example of strong fluidity of human sexualities i.e. sexual orientations of human males as it shows how intertwined it is with bisexual orientation of human males yet not sufficiently to elope being defined as heterosexual orientation albeit not limited exclusively nor always only on the opposite cis-gender (biological females). main parameters of measurement for the purpose were degrees of frequency or regularity of sexual or pro-sexual activities outside the chains of category 1. , and the characterizations deduced from the fixed (or unfixed) sexual and/or pro-sexual roles in the sexual or pro-sexual activities outside the chains of category 1.
*(mutual) masturbations in types 2 a) and 2 b) are when they gather together- real men buddies, dudes (u nas, burazi, ortaci, drkadžije, pajdaši) either fantasize about biological females or about sexually "passive", "submissive", "bottom" biological men that they find somehow someways remind them of females and/or certain types of biological and/or modifed men (often or potentially incl. varieties of transvestite or transgendered individuals) and show it off either to the above-mentioned objects of their fantasizing when masturbating or to the other general public even incl. any men that watches/watch. also, it could mean even technical mutual masturbations with some "passive", "submissive", "bottom" biological men that they find somehow someways remind them of females (example, those heterosexual men masturbate their penises while they masturbate i.e. rub holes or pinch nipples of "passive", "submissive", "bottom" biological men that they find somehow someways remind them of females and/or certain types of biological and/or modifed men (often or potentially incl. varieties of transvestite transgendered individuals). in type 2 c) same, only different in being less strict or less fixed in pro-sexual alpha-hyper-masculine dominant roles.

Poslato: 26 Dec 2017, 23:34
od Casino
:doh:

Re: Potrebna mi je pomoc

Poslato: 26 Dec 2017, 23:49
od Vel boy
pa, ako stvarno znaš engleski i stvarno razumeo šta sam napisao, reci šta sam krivo i netačno napisao! :cekam:

Re: Potrebna mi je pomoc

Poslato: 27 Dec 2017, 05:17
od *deni*
[url=http://www.gay-serbia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2806601#p2806601]Vel boy napisao:[/url]između ostalog čitav život sam se bavio na razne načine psihama samoizjašnjenih heteroseksualnih muškaraca, i evo, na engleskom, šta su moji zaključci s kojim se slažu i svi relevantni savremeni progresivni psiholozi, antropolozi itd....
A sta si ti, Vela, po struci ?